Post TAVR Aspirin vs. Clopidogrel: Conflicting Findings and Guidelines

One month ago we shared a meta-analysis stating aspirin (ASA) as the best antiplatelet following TAVR vs. 3 to 6 dual antiplatelet therapy suggested by guidelines. 

At that time, guideline recommendations appeared obsolete. Several studies had started to support ASA monotherapy as the best antiaggregation scheme after TAVR. However, in the light of this new study published in Circulation, now aspirin does not appear to be the definitive solution either.

This is relevant because, so far, no study had questioned the use of aspirin in this scenario. 

All things considered, and the latest publication not necessarily translates into correct information. What this study clearly shows is the existing disagreement over the best antiaggregation scheme following TAVR

The OCEAN-TAVI registry included patients undergoing TAVR between 2013 and 2017 in several centers in Japan. The registry identified 829 cases discharged with aspirin (100 mg) or clopidogrel (75 mg). 

These were stratified according to anticoagulation need. Propensity score was used to adjust baseline characteristics between the ASA and the Clopidogrel groups. 


Read also: Dual Antiplatelet Therapy and TAVR: Obsolete Guidelines.


Primary end point was all cause death, cardiovascular death, life threatening bleeding and major bleeding within 2 years after procedure. 

After adjusting, researchers were left with 196 patients (98 ASA and 98 clopidogrel) not requiring anticoagulation and 314 patients (157 ASA and 157 clopidogrel) requiring anticoagulation, especially because of atrial fibrillation. 

All-cause mortality resulted similar between patients requiring and not requiring anticoagulation, regardless medication (with anticoagulation: aspirin 17.5% vs clopidogrel 11.1%; p=0.07. Without anticoagulation: aspirin 29.6% vs clopidogrel 20.1%; p=0.15).


Read also: Myocarditis and Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccine: What Is the Risk?


These findings completely changed when looking at cardiovascular mortality. For this end point, clopidogrel got a clear advantage at 2-year followup, regardless anticoagulation requirement (with anticoagulation: aspirin 8.5% vs clopidogrel 2.7%; p=0.03. Without: aspirin 18% vs clopidogrel 5.2%; p=0.02).

Conclusion

According to this study, clopidogrel monotherapy is associated with lower cardiovascular mortality compared against aspirin monotherapy at 2-year follow up, after TAVR, regardless anticoagulation requirement. 

Original Title: Aspirin Versus Clopidogrel as Single Antithrombotic Therapy After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insight From the OCEAN-TAVI Registry.

Reference: Yusuke Kobari et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 May;14(5):e010097. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.010097.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Hemodynamic Outcomes of Edge-to-Edge Repair in Degenerative and Functional Mitral Regurgitation

Transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (M-TEER) has become an established therapeutic option for mitral valve disease. Among the available techniques, M-TEER using the MitraClip...

SAPIEN 3 TAVI Durability: Ten-Year Follow-Up in Intermediate-Risk Patients

The durability of transcatheter bioprosthetic valves used in TAVI remains one of the key unanswered questions as indications continue to expand toward patients with...

Inflammation after TAVI: An Emerging Therapeutic Target?

Conduction disturbances and the need for permanent pacemaker implantation remain common complications following TAVI, with an incidence approaching 15%. Although they have traditionally been...

Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: A New Volumetric Index to Consider

Coronary obstruction during TAVI is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication, particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, in anatomies with small sinuses of Valsalva, low coronary...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...

Dual-Prep Registry: Atherectomy and IVL for Severe Coronary Calcification

Severe coronary calcification remains one of the most challenging scenarios in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although rotational or orbital atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)...