Do Symptoms and Quality of Life Differ between Focal and Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease?

Changes in fractional flow reserve (FFR) values after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are associated with improvement in angina symptoms. The pattern of baseline coronary artery disease influences the degree of variation in FFR after stent implantation.

La coronariografía precoz reduce la mortalidad en SCA sin supradesnivel del ST de alto riesgo

Focal coronary artery disease leads to high post-PCI FFR values, while the improvement is not as marked in diffuse coronary artery disease. Baseline pattern of coronary disease can anticipate the likelihood of successful improvement in angina symptoms. However, the definition of diffuse disease has not been standardized and is often based on visual assessment, limiting its accuracy and repeatability.

Using the pullback pressure gradient (PPG) of the FFR, the aim of this subanalysis of the randomized, prospective, single-center study TARGET-FFR (Trial of Angiography vs. pressure-Ratio-Guided Enhancement Techniques-Fractional Flow Reserve) was to investigate the differential effect on patient-reported outcomes of PCI on focal (PPG ≥0.66) and diffuse (PPG <0.66) disease.

The endpoints were questionnaires to assess the presence of angina and patient quality of life.

A total of 103 patients were analyzed: 51 had focal disease and 52 had diffuse disease. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. The mean PPG was 0.66. Patients with focal disease were treated with fewer (p = 0.022) and shorter (p = 0.015) stents. In addition, this population had higher post-PCI FFR values (p < 0.001) and greater change was observed after intervention (p < 0.001).

Read also: Pulmonary Artery Denervation: Valid Alternative for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Grade 1?

After PCI, almost 40% of patients experienced residual angina, which was significantly lower in patients with focal disease compared with diffuse disease (27.5% vs. 51.9%, respectively; p = 0.020). In addition, patients with focal coronary artery disease reported less angina, less physical limitation, and better quality of life.

On the other hand, after PCI, patients with focal disease experienced increased mobility and self-care, and decreased pain and discomfort. There were no differences in the presence of anxiety and/or depression between both groups.

Conclusion

Residual angina after PCI was frequent and found in patients with diffuse coronary disease defined as pre-PCI PPG. After PCI, patients with focal disease experienced angina improvement and better quality of life. PPG was useful to identify patients who would benefit from percutaneous revascularization in terms of symptomatic improvement.

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the editorial board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Differential Improvement in Angina and Health-Related Quality of Life After Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Focal and Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease.

Reference: Carlos Collet, MD, PHD et al J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2022.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

OCT-Detected High-Risk Plaques Predict Recurrent Events After Myocardial Infarction

After a myocardial infarction (MI), non-culprit lesions are often deferred when they are not flow-limiting (negative FFR). However, these lesions continue to represent an...

Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in ACS Patients Receiving DOAC After PCI: More Bleeding Without Ischemic Benefit?

In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who require direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) and undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), current guidelines recommend a dual...

EuroPCR 2026 | 10-Year Left Main PCI: When Survival Is Similar, Should the Less Invasive Strategy Prevail?

The primary goal of revascularization in left main coronary artery disease (LMCA) is to improve survival. However, debate continues regarding whether, in anatomically suitable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: A New Volumetric Index to Consider

Coronary obstruction during TAVI is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication, particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, in anatomies with small sinuses of Valsalva, low coronary...

EARLY TAVR: Impact of Age on Outcomes of Early TAVR in Asymptomatic Patients

Asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis represents an increasingly common clinical challenge. Although current guidelines recommend intervention once symptoms develop or left ventricular dysfunction occurs, concerns...

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...