Coronary Angioplasty in Chronic Total Occlusions (CTO): Are There Sex Differences?

Studies and registries assessing sex differences in chronic total occlusions (CTO) are limited and women are under-represented, accounting for only 14%-21% of included patients. Even though success rate is comparable between sexes, several studies have shown higher complications rate among women.  

Angioplastia coronaria en oclusiones totales crónicas (CTO): ¿Hay diferencias entre ambos sexos?

The aim of this study was to identify sex related baseline and procedural differences, as well as intervention success and inhospital clinical outcomes after CTO PCI. It was based on a prospective, multicenter European study on CTO.

Primary end point was procedural success rate between cohorts (men vs women) defined as TIMI=3 and residual stenosis lower than 20%. Secondary end points were inhospital major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) and procedural complications. 

The study looked at 35449 patients enrolled in the registry, 15.2% of which were women. As regards baseline characteristics, women were older (P<0.001), has more hypertension (P<0.001) and diabetes (P<0.001). Women more often presented angina, and FC III or IV (P<0.001). However, showed lower prevalence of prior AMI, prior PCI or CABG and lower three- vessel disease vs men. The right coronary artery was most frequently affected with no difference between sexes.  Nevertheless, women presented lower J-CTO score (2.02 ± 1.26 vs. 2.23 ± 1.27, p < 0.001). 

Read also: Abbreviated Antiaggregant Treatment in High Bleeding Risk Patients from the MASTER-DAPT (15-Month Followup).

The anterograde strategy was the preferred one for women (P=0.002), while the retrograde was more used in men (P<0.001). The amount of contrast used (P<0.001), fluoroscopy time (P< 0.001) and total procedural time (P<0.001) were significantly lower in women vs. men. 

As regards primary end point, CTO recanalization rate was higher in women (87.3% vs. 86.3%, p = 0.046). When it came to the secondary end point, there were no differences in terms of inhospital MACCEs, but complications such as coronary perforation (3.7% vs.2.8%, p < 0.001), vascular complications (1.0% vs. 0.6%, p < 0.001) and major bleeding (0.4% vs. 0.2%, p < 0.001) were more frequent in women. 

Conclusion

In this multicenter European registry on CTO, women represented less than 15.2% of the cohort and there was a high CTO recanalization rate. While there were no differences between sexes when it came to inhospital MACCEs, procedural complications were more frequent in women vs. men. There were no differences as regards procedural success predictors related to coronary anatomy or CTO characteristics.  

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Gender differences in percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions from the ERCTO study.

Reference: Alexandre Avran MD et al Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023;101:918–931.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

CRT 2026 | CUT-DRESS Trial: Lesion Preparation with Cutting Balloon

In-stent restenosis (ISR) continues to represent a relevant clinical challenge in contemporary coronary angioplasty practice. Despite advances in drug-eluting stents, neointimal hyperplasia and suboptimal...

CRT 2026 | Clopidogrel vs Aspirin as Long-Term Monotherapy After Coronary Angioplasty

The use of aspirin as chronic antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has historically been the standard recommended by international guidelines. However, recent...

Bioresorbable devices vs DES in patients at high risk of restenosis. Seven-year follow-up of the COMPARE-ABSORB trial

Studies with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have shown that the rate of target lesion failure (TLF) increases linearly up to 5–10 years of follow-up,...

Sheathless Femoral Impella: A New Strategy to Reduce Vascular Complications in High-Risk PCI?

Patients with complex coronary artery disease or cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may benefit from the hemodynamic support provided by percutaneous ventricular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

CRT 2026 | TAVI-CLOSE Trial: Dual Suture vs Suture + Plug for Vascular Closure After Transfemoral TAVI

The transfemoral approach is the predominant strategy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Although vascular complications are currently less frequent, they remain relevant determinants...

CRT 2026 | NAVITOR IDE: Hemodynamic Outcomes and 5-Year Durability of an Intra-Annular Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve

As TAVI expands into younger populations and patients with lower surgical risk, prosthesis durability has become a key aspect of long-term management. The NAVITOR...

CRT 2026 | CUT-DRESS Trial: Lesion Preparation with Cutting Balloon

In-stent restenosis (ISR) continues to represent a relevant clinical challenge in contemporary coronary angioplasty practice. Despite advances in drug-eluting stents, neointimal hyperplasia and suboptimal...