Modelos europeos de telemedicina, como el servicio finlandés Medilux, permiten realizar consultas médicas online mediante un cuestionario clínico, sin acudir a una consulta presencial.

TAVR: Does HALT Affect Follow-Up?

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in low-risk patients has been shown to be superior or noninferior in randomized studies, but the presence of valvular thrombosis, in its different forms, has not been well analyzed, nor is there much information on its impact on evolution.

TAVI: Balón expandible o autoexpandible ¿Cuál es la respuesta?

Researchers conducted an analysis of the LTR study that included 200 patients, where evolution of subclinical thrombosis was observed at 30 days.

The analysis included a 4-year follow-up of 177 patients.

The mean age was 74 years, most patients were men, 30% had diabetes, 85% had hypertension, 8% had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), 9.5% had experienced a stroke, 21% had undergone coronary angioplasty (CTA), 1% had undergone myocardial revascularization surgery (MRS), 32.5% had a previous permanent pacemaker implantation, and 6% had suffered a prior infarction. Ejection fraction was preserved, aortic valve area (AVAo) was 0.75, and mean gradient was 47.5 mmHg.

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) mortality score was 1.8%.

The procedure was performed via transfemoral access in all patients; 75.5% of patients went under anesthetic sedation, and balloon-expandable valves were used in 88% of cases.

At 30 days, 14% of the patients experienced HALT; only 5 were treated using anticoagulants.

Read also: Useful Predictor of Adverse Events in Complex PCI: BCIS CHIP Score.

At the 4-year follow-up, there were no differences between patients who did not experience HALT in mean gradient and AVAo (14.94±5.01 mmHg vs. 12.3±5.57 mmHg; p = 0.23 and 1.64±0.6 cm2 vs. 1.7±0.52 cm2; p = 0.81, respectively). There were also no differences in moderate structural deterioration (5.8%) nor in hemodynamic deterioration (1.5%), and no patients presented severe structural deterioration. Ejection fraction was similar in both groups and just one patient with HALT suffered a stroke.

Between the second and fourth year, all-cause mortality was 11.9%, cardiovascular mortality was 3.3%, and there were no differences between groups.

Conclusion

TAVR in symptomatic low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis in the tricuspid valve was safe and durable at 4 years. Structural damage was low, regardless of valve type, and HALT presence at 30 days had no impact on structural damage, hemodynamic profile of the valve, or stroke rates at 4 years.

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Impact of Subclinical Leaflet Thrombosis in Low- Risk Patients: LRT Trial 4-Year Outcomes

Reference: Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023;16:e012655. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012655.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks in high-risk patients: clinical outcomes and the impact of residual leak

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively frequent complication following valve replacement (overall incidence 5–18%; 2–10% in the aortic position and 7–17% in the mitral...

SCAI 2026 | Can an atrial fixation device prevent complications of transcatheter mitral valve replacement? Analysis of the AltaValve system

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) represents one of the most complex areas within structural interventions. Unlike TAVI, where valvular anatomy typically provides more predictable...

Beyond TAVI: Cardiac Rehabilitation as a Determinant of Clinical Outcomes

Aortic stenosis is an increasingly prevalent condition associated with population aging, with a prevalence of approximately 3.4% in individuals over 75 years of age...

Comparative outcomes between transaxillary approach and thoracotomy-based approaches in TAVI with alternative access

TAVI has become the standard treatment for high-risk aortic stenosis. When transfemoral access is not feasible (approximately 10–15%), alternative approaches are used: transaxillary (subclavian...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks in high-risk patients: clinical outcomes and the impact of residual leak

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively frequent complication following valve replacement (overall incidence 5–18%; 2–10% in the aortic position and 7–17% in the mitral...

SCAI 2026 | Deep vein arterialization as an alternative in patients with critical limb ischemia without conventional options

Critical limb ischemia (CLI) represents one of the most advanced stages of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). In a significant proportion of patients, distal anatomy,...

SCAI 2026 | Can an atrial fixation device prevent complications of transcatheter mitral valve replacement? Analysis of the AltaValve system

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) represents one of the most complex areas within structural interventions. Unlike TAVI, where valvular anatomy typically provides more predictable...