aortic valve replacement

Válvula Bicúspide

Good Evolution of Bicuspid Valves with EVOLUTE or EVOLUTE PRO

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava. TAVR has matured over time and has advanced onto low risk patients, but one of its greatest challenges continues to be bicuspid valve patients. These represent between 1% and 2% of the population and over 20% of young adults requiring surgical valve replacement (SAVR).&nbsp; The study looked at 27,086 patients<a href="https://solaci.org/en/2020/08/28/good-evolution-of-bicuspid-valves-with-evolute-or-evolute-pro/" title="Read more" >...</a>

Doble puente mamario para reducir la chance de nuevas revascularizaciones

Surgical Valve Replacement Might Soon Be History

Patients with dysfunctional biological prosthetic valves have better outcomes with TAVR vs. surgical reintervention, beyond surgical risk. This study outcomes might even call into question the age cutoff to consider a mechanical vs. a biological prosthesis at first surgery. This analysis recently published in JACC looked at the outcomes of both possible strategies to treat<a href="https://solaci.org/en/2020/08/26/surgical-valve-replacement-might-soon-be-history/" title="Read more" >...</a>

valve_in_valve-compressor

Valve in Valve Presents Better Evolution than re-SARV

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava. Surgical aortic valve replacement with bioprosthesis has proved its benefits, but it fails after 10 to 15 years.&nbsp; Transcatheter aortic valve replacement has been shown valid, especially in high risk patients, but we still have little information and no head to head studies to know what is best in this<a href="https://solaci.org/en/2020/08/04/valve-in-valve-presents-better-evolution-than-re-sarv/" title="Read more" >...</a>

La válvula CoreValve Evolut R arroja resultados positivos en una población importante de pacientes La Evolut R, al igual que su predecesora CoreValve, es una válvula autoexpandible, supra-anular, de pericardio porcino en un stent de nitinol. Entre las mejoras de esta válvula se pueden enumerar su mejor perfil y la posibilidad de re-envainarla. Esto la hace completamente reposicionable e incluso recapturable. Faltaba ver si estas ventajas técnicas se traducirían en ventajas clínicas (lo cual es -en definitiva- lo que importa) en una población grande de pacientes del mundo real. El estudio FORWARD (CoreValve Evolut R FORWARD) es un registro prospectivo que incluyó 1038 pacientes de 53 centros y cuatro continentes. Los pacientes tuvieron una edad media de 81.8 ± 6.2 años y un STS de 5.5 ± 4.5%, lo cual constituye un riesgo intermedio y coincide con la tendencia actual de la práctica clínica. La capacidad de reposicionar la válvula debió ser utilizada en el 25.8% de los pacientes, característica que permitió el implante de una sola válvula en el lugar correcto en el 98.9% de los casos. A 30 días, la mortalidad fue del 1.9% y el stroke incapacitante del 1.8%. Solo el 1.9% de los pacientes presentó insuficiencia aórtica moderada a severa; la tasa de marcapaso definitivo fue del 17.5%. Ambos datos están por debajo de lo que mostró el estudio SURTAVI con la CoreValve en una población similar (3.4% y 25.9% respectivamente) y la mejora se puede atribuir a la posibilidad de reposicionar el dispositivo. Conclusión La nueva generación de la válvula autoexpandible es segura y efectiva en pacientes con estenosis aórtica severa no seleccionados del mundo real. Comentario editorial La mortalidad por cualquier causa del 1.9% está claramente por debajo del 5.5% esperado según el score de STS y en sintonía con la del 1.1% descripta en el registro que testeó la última generación de la válvula balón expandible SAPIEN 3 en una población similar. El 98% de los pacientes fueron tratados por acceso femoral, lo cual también es la tendencia mundial gracias a la significativa disminución del perfil de los dispositivos. Afortunadamente, la enorme mayoría de las mejoras técnicas que han incorporado los nuevos dispositivos (tanto este como la competencia) han logrado traducirse en mejoras clínicas para los pacientes, logrando reducir la insuficiencia paravalvular, la tasa de marcapaso y las complicaciones vasculares. Título original: Clinical Outcomes With a Repositionable Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Prosthesis. The International FORWARD Study. Referencia: Eberhard Grube et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:845–53.

After 8-year Followup, Good News for the Self Expandable Valve

As the transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) gains ground in lower risk populations and with better survival rate, concern over its durability has grown.&nbsp; This study brings us data and good news on the first-generation self-expandable valve after quite a long follow up. It included 990 inoperable or high-risk patients treated with CoreValve in 8<a href="https://solaci.org/en/2020/07/22/after-8-year-followup-good-news-for-the-self-expandable-valve/" title="Read more" >...</a>

EuroPCR 2020 | Valve in Valve aórtico a largo plazo

EuroPCR 2020 | Aortic Valve in Valve in the Long Term

The outcomes of this work are important to plan valve replacement with the largest possible prosthesis allowed by patient anatomy in the index procedure. As a worldwide trend, increasingly more patients are receiving bioprostheses, which have improved a lot but still tend to become deteriorated and require a valve-in-valve procedure if the patient is no<a href="https://solaci.org/en/2020/07/13/europcr-2020-aortic-valve-in-valve-in-the-long-term/" title="Read more" >...</a>

TAVI: Balón expandible o autoexpandible ¿Cuál es la respuesta?

Self-Expanding Valve vs. Balloon-Expandable Valve, Randomized, Head to Head

The arms raceamong transcatheter valves has been vertiginous. By the time we received the mid- or long-term outcomes of studies focused on a given valve, we were already using its next generation in clinical practice. As a result, there is little information addressing which valve is the best. Nowadays, this arms race has reached a<a href="https://solaci.org/en/2020/06/24/self-expanding-valve-vs-balloon-expandable-valve-randomized-head-to-head/" title="Read more" >...</a>

TAVI: Balón expandible o autoexpandible ¿Cuál es la respuesta?

TAVR: Balloon-Expandable or Self-Expanding Valves, Which Is the Answer?

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos&nbsp;Fava. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has shown benefit and is currently moving towards low-risk patients, as well as bicuspid aortic valves and (to a lower extent) aortic regurgitation. However, we must ponder on which valve should be used on each patient: balloon-expandable (BE) or self-expanding (SE) valve? They represent different technologies<a href="https://solaci.org/en/2020/06/03/tavr-balloon-expandable-or-self-expanding-valves-which-is-the-answer/" title="Read more" >...</a>

Enfermedades malignas y estenosis aórtica ¿Se justifica el TAVI?

Malignancies and Aortic Stenosis: Is TAVR Warranted?

This meta-analysis tells us that patients with active malignancies and severe aortic stenosis have a good evolution after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), except for a higher rate of pacemaker implantation in the general population. These patients must not be limited to respite care only, at least as far as aortic stenosis is concerned. Short-term<a href="https://solaci.org/en/2020/05/26/malignancies-and-aortic-stenosis-is-tavr-warranted/" title="Read more" >...</a>

La angina microvascular podría tener gradientes de riesgo

Aligning Prosthetic Valves to Native Commissures: The Secret to Coronary Artery Obstruction?

Preventing coronary artery obstruction during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) continues to be a challenge. There are techniques to prevent (or at least reduce) this from happening, which could be catastrophic. However, they all somehow fall into palliative care, that is, they will merely provide relief, rather than a cure.&nbsp; Commissure overlapping and the resulting<a href="https://solaci.org/en/2020/05/26/aligning-prosthetic-valves-to-native-commissures-the-secret-to-coronary-artery-obstruction/" title="Read more" >...</a>

implante de la valvula aortica transcateter

TAVR Reaches Low-Risk Patients with Bicuspid Valves

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) seems to be safe in low-risk patients with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis. Their hospital length of stay was very short, with zero mortality, and zero disabling stroke. Subclinical leaflet thrombosis and device durability are still unknown. The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved TAVR for low-risk patients. However,<a href="https://solaci.org/en/2020/04/27/tavr-reaches-low-risk-patients-with-bicuspid-valves/" title="Read more" >...</a>

Top