Modelos europeos de telemedicina, como el servicio finlandés Medilux, permiten realizar consultas médicas online mediante un cuestionario clínico, sin acudir a una consulta presencial.

A New Alternative for the Treatment of Heart Failure: Left Atrial to Coronary Sinus Shunt with the APTURE Device

ALT FLOW device for left atrial to coronary sinus shunting in symptomatic heart failure patients.


In the treatment of heart failure (HF), significant improvement in patient quality of life and prognosis has been achieved through appropriate medical treatment and, in some cases, the use of devices. However, in certain cases, satisfactory clinical improvement cannot be achieved.

Una nueva alternativa para el tratamiento de la insuficiencia cardíaca: Shunt de aurícula izquierda a seno coronario con dispositivo APTURE

One of the characteristics of this pathology is sustained increase in filling pressure, so its treatment and its reduction are the main proposed objectives. Some strategies have been used to decrease this overload, either by improving treatment through monitoring or by allowing for its “decompression” into lower-pressure chambers. These strategies have been based on creating a shunt through the interatrial septum (IAS), with or without a device.

However, it has recently been demonstrated that this strategy does not offer symptomatic or clinical benefits in patients with preserved or mildly impaired ventricular function (REDUCE LAP-HF II). All these devices used the IAS as the location for the shunting.

In a feasibility study conducted by Hibbert et al., called ALT FLOW, the APTURE (Edwards) device was placed to create a shunt from the left atrium (LA) to the coronary sinus (CS) through percutaneous atriotomy (the device allowed for a shunt with an internal diameter of 7 mm and 4 branches). This device allows for physiological flow and minimizes the risks of embolization into systemic circulation.

Read also: Post PCI Functional Assessment for Focal Lesion and Stent Underexpansion Detection.

The study was an open, single-arm trial conducted at 18 centers in the United States and Canada. It included patients with chronic HF in functional class II who had been hospitalized for HF or required intravenous diuretics, and who were already receiving optimal treatment. Right heart catheterization was also conducted, with a requirement of wedge pressure (WP) >15 at rest or >25 during exercise, with a WP-to-right atrial pressure (RAP) delta >5.

The primary safety endpoint was the combination of major cardiovascular, cerebrovascular or renal events, and reintervention at 30 days. Researchers analyzed Success in device placement and clinical success.

Device placement was attempted in 87 patients, with successful placement in 79 of them (91%). Mean age was 70.5 years; 53% of subjects were male, and the average ejection fraction was 59%. There was a high prevalence of obesity (mean body mass index: 33.6), hypertension (92%), and diabetes (44%). Patients were highly symptomatic, with a KCCQ score of 38.3; about 90% of them were NYHA class III.

Read also: VASC-OBSERVANT II Substudy: Impact of Vascular Complications after TAVR.

The pre-specified primary endpoint occurred in 2.3% of patients, 2 of whom required emergency surgery: one due to coronary sinus perforation and another due to embolization. Clinical and procedural success was observed in 88.5% of cases, with a fluoroscopy time of 28 minutes and the use of 48 mL of contrast. Analyzing hospitalizations at 6 months, there was a heart failure hospitalization rate of 3.8%, compared with 44.3% in the year prior to the intervention. Symptomatic improvement was observed according to KCCQ, with an improvement of ≥20 points in 57% of cases and an improvement in functional class I and II from 8% at baseline to 56% at one month, and from 12% at baseline to 67% at 6 months (P <0.001).

Regarding hemodynamic parameters, right heart catheterization at 20W showed a reduction in wedge pressure (WP) at 3 months (average decrease of 7 mmHg) and 6 months (average difference of 7 mmHg).

Conclusions

Shunting with the APTURE device to decompress the left atrium offers the theoretical advantage of preserving septal anatomy, and flow direction towards the coronary sinus and then to the right atrium reduces the possibility of paradoxical embolization. A sustained and significant reduction in WP and symptoms was observed at 3 and 6 months, so a randomized study should be considered to assess the outcomes.

Dr. Omar Tupayachi

Dr. Omar Tupayachi.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Left Atrial to Coronary Sinus Shunting for Treatment of Symptomatic Heart Failure.

Reference: Hibbert, Benjamin et al. “Left Atrial to Coronary Sinus Shunting for Treatment of Symptomatic Heart Failure.” JACC. Cardiovascular interventions vol. 16,11 (2023): 1369-1380. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2023.03.012.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Implantation Depth Could Determine Thrombosis Risk

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has undergone significant advances over the past two decades. This progress has been driven by the development of new...

Influence of cusp-overlap and three-cusp coplanar techniques on new-onset conduction disturbances after TAVI

New-onset conduction disturbances remain one of the most frequent complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), being associated with worse long-term clinical outcomes. Among...

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks in high-risk patients: clinical outcomes and the impact of residual leak

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively frequent complication following valve replacement (overall incidence 5–18%; 2–10% in the aortic position and 7–17% in the mitral...

SCAI 2026 | Can an atrial fixation device prevent complications of transcatheter mitral valve replacement? Analysis of the AltaValve system

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) represents one of the most complex areas within structural interventions. Unlike TAVI, where valvular anatomy typically provides more predictable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Implantation Depth Could Determine Thrombosis Risk

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has undergone significant advances over the past two decades. This progress has been driven by the development of new...

Influence of cusp-overlap and three-cusp coplanar techniques on new-onset conduction disturbances after TAVI

New-onset conduction disturbances remain one of the most frequent complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), being associated with worse long-term clinical outcomes. Among...

KISS Trial: provisional stenting in non-left main coronary bifurcations — is less more?

Coronary bifurcation angioplasty remains one of the most frequent and technically challenging scenarios in interventional cardiology. Between 15% and 20% of coronary procedures involve...