Coronary disease articles

Ischemic versus anatomical risk. Is anyone better to help us decide therapeutically?

Ischemic versus anatomical risk. Is anyone better to help us decide therapeutically?

Original title: Predicting Outcome in the COURAGE Trial. Coronary Anatomy Versus Ischemia. Reference: G. B. John Mancini et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2013, Article in press.   Anatomical risk, ischemic amount or a combination of both, are often factors taken into account for estimating the prognosis or choose a treatment strategy. The COURAGE study (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing

Everolimus-eluting stent and DEB in restenosis for BMS. Good results of both with some expected differences.

Original title: A Randomized Comparison of Drug-Eluting Balloon Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With Bare-Metal Stent In-Stent Restenosis: The RIBS V Clinical Trial. Reference: Fernando Alfonso et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; Epub ahead of print.   Drug-eluting stents (DES) have proven to be superior in terms of restenosis than bare metal stents (BMS). BMS, however due

Longer follow-up registry of angioplasty in left main coronary artery. Significant differences according to the diseased segment.

Original title: The DELTA Registry (Drug-Eluting Stent for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease): A Multicenter registry Evaluating Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for left Main Treatment Reference: Naganuma T, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2013;6:1242–9 Angioplasty of the unprotected left coronary trunk has increased significantly in recent years showing good results. Currently the

Stent reestenosis, the only subgroup that benefits from longer double antiaggregation

Original title: Short vs. Long Term Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients treated for InstentRestenosis. A PRODIGY Trial substudy. Reference: Gianluca Campo el al. J Am CollCardiol, article in press.   In the study PRODIGY (Prolonging Dual Antiplatelet Treatment After Grading Stent- Induced Intimal Hyperplasia) we found that the 24 months ratio of dual antiaggregation was not

Unprotected trunk in diabetics: angioplasty with good long-term results but more revascularization

Original title: Coronary artery bypass graft versus percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation for diabetic patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: D-DELTA registry. Reference: Meliga Emanuele, et al. EuroIntervention 2013; 9:803-808 Diabetes increases cardiovascular risk events because of their involvement in diffuse form of the vessels, thereby generating more events and changes in revascularization strategy

Everolimus -eluting stent to 3 years, most security was the key difference.

Original title: Everolimus-eluting stents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary Intervention: Final 3-year results of the Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Subjects With de Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions trial. Reference: Sorin J. Brener et al. Am Heart J 2013;0:1-8. The XIENCE stent (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA) is

Primary angioplasty with 2nd generation drug-eluting stents

Original title: Stent thrombosis with second-generation drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents: Network meta-analysis of primary percutaneous coronary intervention trials in ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction. Reference: Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013; Epub ahead of print. To compare the safety and efficacy of 2nd generation drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare metal stents (BMS) in the context of primary angioplasty was conducted

Angioplasty or medical therapy in patients with documented ischemia

Original title: Percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes in patients with stable obstructive coronary artery disease and myocardial ischemia: A collaborative meta-analysis of contemporary randomized clinical trials. Reference: Stergiopoulos K el al. JAMA Intern Med 2013; DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013 The amount in ischemic patients with stable coronary heart disease is associated with poor prognosis. However, it is unclear whether revascularization to reduce

Drug eluting balloon followed BMS versus DES in de novo lesions

Original title: Elutax paclitaxel-eluting balloon followed by bare-metal stent compared with Xience V drug-eluting stent in the treatment of de novo coronary stenosis: A randomized trial. Reference: Francesco Liistro et al. Am Heart J 2013;166:920-6. Recently, drug eluting balloons (DEB) have emerged as a potential alternative to drug-eluting stents (DES). Paclitaxel is an appropriate drug for DEBs given

Percutaneous closure devices in coronary angioplasty, the benefit is for obese patients

Original title: Comparative safety of vascular closure devices and manual closure among patients having percutaneous coronary intervention. Reference: Gurm HS et al. Ann Intern Med. 2013; Epub ahead of print. The use of percutaneous closure devices in patients who undergo coronary angioplasty by femoral access is controversial and its use has gradually changed over time. This record analyzed

Similar results of drug-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer versus permanent

Original title: Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting StentA Randomized, Controlled, Noninferiority Trial.NEXT trial. Reference: Masahiro Natsuaki et al. J Am CollCardiol 2013;62:181–90. Drug-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer were designed to counteract the long-term adverse effects on the vascular wall of permanent polymer.  This prospective, multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority design study, compared the biolimus eluting stent with

Top