Modelos europeos de telemedicina, como el servicio finlandés Medilux, permiten realizar consultas médicas online mediante un cuestionario clínico, sin acudir a una consulta presencial.

Evolut R: Clinical Results Might Be Better than Those for First-Generation CoreValve

Evolut R corevalveTwo recent articles featured in  JACC Cardiovascular Interventions  showed that short term (at 30 days) outcomes of patients treated with the next-generation self-expanding Medtronic Evolut R valves could present several advantages compared to the original CoreValve, including recapturability. Both analyses reported similar rates of all-cause mortality and stroke.

 

The study carried out by Dr. Jeffrey Popma as main investigator reported outcomes for 241 patients who were not suitable candidates for surgery (but who could have undergone surgery nevertheless) and were included in the CoreValveEvolut R US Clinical Study registry. At 30 days, the rate of all-cause mortality was 2.5% and the rate of disabling stroke was 3.3%. Life-threatening or major bleeding occurred in 7.1% of patients.

 

In the other published study, Dr. Kalra analyzed 264 real-world consecutive patients participating in the UK and Ireland registry. As regards outcomes, the rate of all-cause mortality at 30 days was 2.3% and the rate of stroke was 3.8% (all non-disabling).

 

In the UK registry, the rate of pacemaker implantation was 14.7%, and the device was implanted a mean of 3 days after the procedure. In the US trial, the rate of pacemaker implantation was 16.4%.

 

The most notorious difference between these studies was related to the rates of paravalvular leak, for which one of the studies reported moderate or severe leak in 7.7% of patients and, in the other, the rate was lower (5.3%), all leaks were moderate, and no severe cases were reported.

 

The next-generation CoreValve device, called Evolut R, is a recapturable and repositionable valve implanted through a delivery system of only 14-F.

 

In the European registry, the average age of patients was 81 years old and the EuroSCORE was 19.9. Approximately 40% of patients received a valve without general anesthesia and only sedation. This is in agreement with the worldwide minimalistic trend in this regard.

 

Both studies reported a low rate of vascular complications (between 5% and 7%), as expected from a 14-F device.

 

The rate of pacemaker implantation with first-generation CoreValve devices of around 25% was clearly improved with Evolut R, bringing this valve much closer to results observed with the balloon-expandable valve.

 

While these outcomes for Evolut R have been recently published, a newer next-generation device, called Evolut R PRO, is already available in some places. This device features a porcine pericardial skirt aimed at reducing the rate of paravalvular leak.

 

Original title: Early Clinical Outcomes AfterTranscatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Using a Novel Self-Expanding Bioprosthesis in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Who Are Suboptimal for Surgery.

Reference: PopmaJJ et al. J Am CardiolIntv 2017;10:268-275 y Kalra SS et al. J Am CardiolIntv 2017;10:276-282.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

SCAI 2026 | Can an atrial fixation device prevent complications of transcatheter mitral valve replacement? Analysis of the AltaValve system

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) represents one of the most complex areas within structural interventions. Unlike TAVI, where valvular anatomy typically provides more predictable...

Beyond TAVI: Cardiac Rehabilitation as a Determinant of Clinical Outcomes

Aortic stenosis is an increasingly prevalent condition associated with population aging, with a prevalence of approximately 3.4% in individuals over 75 years of age...

Comparative outcomes between transaxillary approach and thoracotomy-based approaches in TAVI with alternative access

TAVI has become the standard treatment for high-risk aortic stenosis. When transfemoral access is not feasible (approximately 10–15%), alternative approaches are used: transaxillary (subclavian...

Management of Valve Thrombosis in TAVI: Current Evidence-Based Approach

The expansion of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) into younger and lower-risk populations has brought bioprosthetic valve thrombosis to the forefront as a clinically...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

SCAI 2026 | Deep vein arterialization as an alternative in patients with critical limb ischemia without conventional options

Critical limb ischemia (CLI) represents one of the most advanced stages of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). In a significant proportion of patients, distal anatomy,...

SCAI 2026 | Can an atrial fixation device prevent complications of transcatheter mitral valve replacement? Analysis of the AltaValve system

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) represents one of the most complex areas within structural interventions. Unlike TAVI, where valvular anatomy typically provides more predictable...

SCAI 2026 | SELUTION DeNovo subanalysis: Use of sirolimus-eluting balloon in acute coronary syndrome

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation remains the predominant strategy in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, in recent...