Modelos europeos de telemedicina, como el servicio finlandés Medilux, permiten realizar consultas médicas online mediante un cuestionario clínico, sin acudir a una consulta presencial.

TriClip: Tricuspid Regurgitation Dedicated Device

Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is difficult to manage and is associated to high morbimortality. 

TriClip: dispositivo dedicado para la insuficiencia tricuspídea 

Surgical repair is complex and not free from complications: its mortality rate ranges from 5 to 20% and depends on series, surgeon and center expertise.

Edge-to-edge repair with clips has become a valid alternative to treat this disease, but most data come from one device designed to treat the mitral valve. 

The TRILUMINATE Pivotal is an international, randomized control study of patients with severe symptomatic TR undergoing transcatheter repair with TriClip (Abbott Structural Heart) vs a control group.  All patients received complete guideline medical therapy. 

Primary end point was a hierarchical composite of all cause death, surgical tricuspid repair, hospitalization for heart failure, and improved quality of life as an increase of at least 15 points in the KCCQ score. 

Read also: TAVR: Vascular Access in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease, 1-Year Outcomes.

It included 350 patients, half receiving the device and the rest as part of the control group. 

There were no differences between the groups. Mean age was 78 and 55% were women. 60% was in functional class III-IV, 90% had atrial fibrillation, 8% stroke, 18% prior CABG, 15% aortic valve surgery and 20% mitral valve surgery. eGFR was 54 ml/min, BNP was 3.600 pg/ml, and the 6-minute walk test was 250 meters.

90% of patients were on diuretics, 65% on beta-blockers, 38% ACE-I, ARB or ARNI and 9% vessel dilators. 

Read also: COAPT: Promising 5-Year Outcomes.

Ejection fraction was 59%, right end diastolic diameter was 51 mm and tricuspid annulus 44 mm. In addition, right atrial volume was 148 ml and 70% were massive or torrential TR. 

Device implantation rate was 98.8%. Two 2.2 clips were used per patient. 

Primary end point at 12 months was in favor of the device (win ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.06 to 2.13; P = 0.02). There were no differences in all-cause mortality, tricuspid valve surgery or hospitalization for cardiac failure. Quality of life improved in patients receiving the device. It increased 12.3±1.8 in the Triclip group vs. 0.6±1.8 (p<0.001) in the control group. 

The presence of minor to moderate TR was superior in the Triclip group (87% vs. 4.8% p<0.001).

There were no differences in 6-minute walk test outcomes. 

Conclusion

Edge-to-edge repair was safe in patients with severe tricuspid failure, reducing severity and was associated to better quality of life. 

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Transcatheter Repair for Patients with Tricuspid Regurgitation. TRILUMINATE Pivotal.

Reference: Paul Sorajja, et al NEJM DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2300525. 


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks in high-risk patients: clinical outcomes and the impact of residual leak

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively frequent complication following valve replacement (overall incidence 5–18%; 2–10% in the aortic position and 7–17% in the mitral...

SCAI 2026 | Can an atrial fixation device prevent complications of transcatheter mitral valve replacement? Analysis of the AltaValve system

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) represents one of the most complex areas within structural interventions. Unlike TAVI, where valvular anatomy typically provides more predictable...

Beyond TAVI: Cardiac Rehabilitation as a Determinant of Clinical Outcomes

Aortic stenosis is an increasingly prevalent condition associated with population aging, with a prevalence of approximately 3.4% in individuals over 75 years of age...

Comparative outcomes between transaxillary approach and thoracotomy-based approaches in TAVI with alternative access

TAVI has become the standard treatment for high-risk aortic stenosis. When transfemoral access is not feasible (approximately 10–15%), alternative approaches are used: transaxillary (subclavian...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

KISS Trial: provisional stenting in non-left main coronary bifurcations — is less more?

Coronary bifurcation angioplasty remains one of the most frequent and technically challenging scenarios in interventional cardiology. Between 15% and 20% of coronary procedures involve...

Complex radial access: a four-step protocol to overcome loops and tortuosity

Radial access is currently the preferred strategy for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions due to its lower rates of bleeding and vascular complications...

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks in high-risk patients: clinical outcomes and the impact of residual leak

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively frequent complication following valve replacement (overall incidence 5–18%; 2–10% in the aortic position and 7–17% in the mitral...