Tag Archives: TAVR

Endocarditis infecciosa post TAVI

Is TAVR Beneficial in Cardiogenic Shock?

Is TAVR Beneficial in Cardiogenic Shock?

The presence of cardiogenic shock (CS) in a setting of aortic stenosis ranges from 1% to 4%. The prognosis for this scenario is ominous due to subendocardial ischemia, which presents as a decrease in ventricular preload and an increase in afterload. Aortic valvuloplasty has been used in this context, but, unfortunately, it has been associated

Impella

Impella in High Risk Coronary Angioplasty before TAVR

The population is aging, which is closely related with the presence of aortic stenosis. This condition, as we know, is associated with coronary artery disease (CAD) approximately in 50% of cases. In high risk surgical patients, this calls for procedures such as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).   PCI with ventricular

TCT 2023 | ALIGN AR trial

TCT 2023 | EVOLUT Low Risk: 4-Year Follow-up

In recent years, there has been a steady increase in the use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in younger patients, with an average age of 74 years, as observed in US medical records. This trend goes alongside encouraging durability results, as demonstrated in the 10-year NOTION study, where structural valve degeneration (SVD) with first-generation

TCT 2023 | ALIGN AR trial

TCT 2023 | The WATCH-TAVR Study

In the TVT registry, around 40% of the patients eligible for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) had atrial fibrillation, and there were high levels of adverse events after starting anticoagulant treatment, especially with oral anticoagulants (VKAs), primarily due to bleeding. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of combined

Sedación consciente vs anestesia general en el TAVI

Cause of Cardiac Death after TAVR at Present

Cardiac failure (CF) and sudden cardiac death (SCD) stand out as two of the main causes of death in patients with aortic stenosis. Although transcatheter aortic valve intervention has shown higher survival, these two continue to be the main conditions leading to patient death at followup.  In its early days, TAVR also showed benefits, but

pacemaker marcapasos definitivo

Predictors and Evolution of Need for PPM after TAVR with Self-Expanding Valves

In the context of TAVR, one of the current challenges is the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPM), especially when using self-expanding valves (SEV). The information available in this regard remains controversial; while some studies suggest new PPM implantation will have no significant effect on clinical evolution, others have associated them with worse prognosis.  As

Nuevas guías de valvulopatías con actualizaciones clave en TAVI e insuficiencia mitral

TAVR Durability at 5 Years in Intermediate Risk Patients

TAVR has been shown beneficial in patients across the risk spectrum. The PARTNER 2 SAPIEN 3 (P2S3i) study on intermediate risk patients was the first to show TAVR superiority vs SAVR when using the transfemoral approach.  SAVR durability has been shown in different analysis but, except for a few reports, TAVR durability at long term

El estudio CULPRIT-SHOCK finalmente se publica en el NEJM y llega para cambiar las guías

Aortic Stenosis and Cardiogenic Shock: Is TAVR an Option?

Cardiogenic shock (CS) in a setting of aortic stenosis is associated with high mortality rates. In consequence, surgery is generally not a possibility for this patient group, and they usually undergo aortic valvuloplasty, resulting in a mortality rate of 33%-50% at 30 days, 70% at one year, and 90% at two years. While transcatheter aortic

Terapia endovascular en stroke: mucha evidencia y pocos operadores entrenados

VASC-OBSERVANT II Substudy: Impact of Vascular Complications after TAVR

At present, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become increasingly common to treat severe symptomatic aortic stenosis, with the transfemoral approach being the most common access strategy, associated to better outcomes vs. other access sites. Even though vascular complication rates (VC) have dropped given increased operation experience and improved devices, such as the use of

TAVI SURAVI

TAVI in Moderate Aortic Stenosis with Low Ejection Fraction

The presence of aortic stenosis, heart failure, and decreased ventricular function is associated with poor prognosis and high mortality. For this reason, both European and American guidelines classify severe stenosis as a Class I indication. There are two retrospective analyses that demonstrate the benefits of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) via transfemoral access. The TAVR

Top