Drug-eluting stents articles

Perspectivas actuales en el manejo de vasos pequeños

Current Perspectives on the Management of Small Vessels

Current Perspectives on the Management of Small Vessels

Current Perspectives on the Management of Small Vessels. Presenters: Dr. León Valdivieso.  Dr. Humberto Casal. This video, sponsored and funded by Medtronic, was filmed during SOLACI-CACI 2017 Congress, at Hilton Buenos Aires Hotel (in Argentina). Do you want to take a look at all other SOLACI-CACI 2017 Congress Medtronic cases? Watch them  We are interested in your opinion. Please,

TCT 2017 | SENIOR: DES con polímero reabsorbible y tiempo de doble antiagregación corto en pacientes añosos

TCT 2017 | SENIOR: DES with a Bioresorbable Polymer and Short Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Elderly Patients

 Courtesy of the SBHCI. This study sought to assess the safety and efficacy of an everolimus-eluting stent with a biodegradable polymer (SYNERGY II) vs. a conventional stent (REBEL) in patients >75 years old with short duration of dual antiplatelet therapy. Before randomization, investigators recorded the planned duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (1 month for stable patients and 6 months

ABSORB III: a 3 años continua la desilusión de la plataforma bioabsorbible

ABSORB III: after 3 Years, the Bioresorbable Scaffold is Still a Disappointment

Courtesy of the SBHCI. The 3-year outcomes of the ABSORB III trial, which randomized 2008 patients 2:1 to an everolimus eluting bioresorbable scaffold (1322 patients) vs. a metallic stent with permanent everolimus eluting polymer (686 patients), was published with low profile and great disappointment. Primary end-point, a composite of target vessel failure, occurred in 13.4% of patients receiving

Absorb IV: la plataforma bioabsorbible con una técnica de implante perfeccionada

Absorb IV: Bioresorbable Scaffolds with an Optimized Implantation Technique

 Courtesy of the SBHCI. The Absorb IV trial randomized 2604 patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive an Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold or a Xience stent. With the aim of minimizing the problems observed in previous studies, the Absorb IV protocol excluded small caliber (<2.5 mm) vessels and included mandatory aggressive pre-dilation followed by non-complacent balloon post-dilation. Patients could

ABSORB II: sin beneficios de la plataforma luego de su reabsorción completa

ABSORB II: No Benefits from Scaffolds After Complete Bioresorption

 Courtesy of the SBHCI. The ABSORB II study sought to assess the mechanical properties of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds, such as the increase in minimal lumen area and the recovery of the vasomotor properties of the treated artery. Last year saw the publishing of negative results for the primary endpoints, registering a higher rate of complications at

DES de 2.0 mm para vasos muy pequeños: ¿Es viable?

2.0-mm DES for Very Small Vessels: Are They Viable?

The reference vessel diameter is a fundamental factor for restenosis after coronary angioplasty even with drug-eluting stents. The smallest sized stents available are 2.25 mm in diameter, but even smaller vessels can be symptomatic. This was a prospective multicenter trial of the Resolute Onyx 2.0-mm zotarolimus-eluting stent. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure. Read also: “Effects

balon farmacologico

Excellent Outcomes for the First Sirolimus Eluting Balloon Tested on Instent Restesosis

Much has been done since studies on conventional balloon angioplasty for BMS instent restenosis showed over 40% new revascularization.  Drug eluting stents, aimed at improving this problem, have never achieved 0% restenosis, which is why technologies such as paclitaxel coated balloons have been developed, with reasonable efficacy (8% to 10% reinterventions rate for BMS restenosis and 17% to 23%

Las plataformas bioabsorbibles no deben ser elegidas por sobre los DES actuales

Bioresorbable Scaffolds Must Not Be Chosen Over Current DES

Although there are 4 approved bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) in Europe, experts suggest that current drug-eluting stents (DES) are the best option for coronary angioplasty. These new guidelines jointly published by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) are an update on the use of BRS in clinical practice

Con la salida del mercado del Absorb surgen nuevas plataformas bioabsorbibles

With Absorb Out, New Resorbable Scaffolds Have Come onto the Market

By restoring vascular physiology and eliminating the inflammatory focus and the chance of fracture and neo atherosclerosis inherent to DES, bioresorbable scaffolds offer the potential to improve long term outcomes. A number of bioresorbable materials have been tested, mainly polylactic acid, with several limitations that have taken the Absorb bioresorbable scaffold out of the market.

These Are the Thrombosis Predictors for Absorb Bioresorbable Scaffolds

J Am Coll Cardiol Intv has recently published a special issue on bioresorbable scaffolds. Abbott’s decision to pull Absorb off the market probably prompted the fast publishing of all related articles sent to the journal. Bioresorbable scaffolds were developed in hopes that they would reduce the rates of events per year 1 year post-implantation by 1.5%-3%

Very Late Thrombosis in Bioresorbable Scaffolds

The presence of a metallic device interrupts normal laminar flow and creates an artery environment that favors thrombosis, leaving the vessel vulnerable to very late thrombosis. Dual antiplatelet therapy, a better implantation technique, and several improvements in new drug-eluting stents (DES) (thinner struts, and higher polymer stability and biocompatibility) have lowered significantly the incidence of

Top