The Valve in Valve (ViV) technique seems to be a better option than repeat surgery for failed aortic bioprosthesis. While this strategy lacks long-term evidence to address issues such as durability, it is considered as an option especially for young patients. ViV to treat failed surgical bioprosthesis has shown lower in-hospital mortality compared with repeat...
The Most Read Articles in Structural Heart Disease of 2020
In this selection, we summarize for you the most important scientific news of 2020 in the field of structural heart disease. 01- Virtual ACC 2020 | COAPT: Better Quality of Life Translates into Harder End-Points After transcatheter mitral valve repair with MitraClip, the COAPT patients saw improved quality of life, better survival rate and fewer hospitalizations...
Sapien 3 Performs Well in “Jobs” for Which It Is Not Designed
Using Sapien 3, transcatheter mitral valve replacement to treat failed bioprosthetic valves can be performed with a high degree of technical success. Failed mitral bioprosthetic valves are truly challenging due to how frequent symptoms are and the high morbidity/mortality associated with a new surgical replacement. Furthermore, there are no catheter options specifically designed to treat this...
Watch again the the 10th ProEducar Educational Meeting- Structural Intervention II
Watch again the “10th ProEducar Educational Meeting – Learning with Experts” on Structural Intervention on our Youtube account. The event was held on 11/19/2020 by the ProEducar area and was attended by more than 200 people. What things will I learn if I watch this video? 05:21 | Valve-in-Valve: Aortic Valve: Implant technique. Educational case....
TCT 2020 | TAVR Appears to Be the Solution for All Dysfunctional Biological Valves
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) results durable at 5 years to treat failed surgical bioprosthetic valves and at one year to treat valves percutaneously. Regardless the type of the failed valve, the solution is TAVR. The 5 year follow up of the PARTNER 2 valve-in-valve (ViV) showed that TAVR as treatment for failed surgical bioprosthetic...
Size Does Matter for Long Term ViV
The size of the original bioprosthetic valve impacts long term mortality, as does the type of bioprosthetic valve used in percutaneous reinterventions. The number of patients with failed bioprosthesis is on the rise, mainly due to increased life expectancy. Valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become more and more common these days and...
The Most Read Articles of August in Interventional Cardiology
01- Myocardial Injury for COVID-19 Even in Young Patients with Mild Symptoms Most young COVID-19 patients not requiring hospitalization showed abnormal cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) beyond two months after diagnosis. Read more HERE 02- Rapid Drop of Antibodies in Mild COVID-19 patients A fast drop in COVID-19 antibodies in mild patients triggers the alarm...
Surgical Valve Replacement Might Soon Be History
Patients with dysfunctional biological prosthetic valves have better outcomes with TAVR vs. surgical reintervention, beyond surgical risk. This study outcomes might even call into question the age cutoff to consider a mechanical vs. a biological prosthesis at first surgery. This analysis recently published in JACC looked at the outcomes of both possible strategies to treat...
SAPIEN 3: Good Outcomes in Bicuspids
Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava. Bicuspid aortic valves are found in approximately 2% of patients and represent the most frequent cause of aortic stenosis in young adults requiring valve replacement. Though TAVR has advanced significantly, this entity has not yet been included in the different randomized studies. At present, we have data from different reports,...
Valve in Valve Presents Better Evolution than re-SARV
Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava. Surgical aortic valve replacement with bioprosthesis has proved its benefits, but it fails after 10 to 15 years. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement has been shown valid, especially in high risk patients, but we still have little information and no “head to head” studies to know what is best in this...